Shopping for Ecological Indices? On the Use of Incidence-Based Species Compositional Similarity Measures

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorMacgregor-Fors, Ian
dc.contributor.authorEscobar, Federico
dc.contributor.authorEscobar-Ibáñez, Juan F.
dc.contributor.authorMesa-Sierra, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorAlvarado, Fredy
dc.contributor.authorRueda-Hernández, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorMoreno, Claudia E.
dc.contributor.authorFalfán, Ina
dc.contributor.authorCorro, Erick J.
dc.contributor.authorPineda, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorBourg, Amandine
dc.contributor.authorAguilar-López, José L.
dc.contributor.authorDáttilo, Wesley
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-14T23:26:12Z
dc.date.available2024-02-14T23:26:12Z
dc.date.issued2022-05
dc.descriptionβ-diversity has been under continuous debate, with a current need to better understand the way in which a new wave of measures work. We assessed the results of 12 incidence-based β-diversity indices. Our results of gradual species composition overlap between paired assemblages considering progressive differences in species richness show the following: (i) four indices (β-2, β-3, β-3.s, and βr) should be used cautiously given that results with no shared species retrieve results that could be misinterpreted; (ii) all measures conceived specifically as partitioned components of species compositional dissimilarities ought to be used as such and not as independent measures per se; (iii) the non-linear response of some indices to gradual species composition overlap should be interpreted carefully, and further analysis using their results as dependent variables should be performed cautiously; and (iv) two metrics (βsim and βsor) behave predictably and linearly to gradual species composition overlap. We encourage ecologists using measures of β-diversity to fully understand their mathematical nature and type of results under the scenario to be used in order to avoid inappropriate and misleading inferences.es_MX
dc.description.sponsorshipITESO, A.C.es
dc.identifier.citationMacGregor-Fors, I.; Escobar, F.; Escobar-Ibáñez, J. F.; Mesa-Sierra, N.; Alvarado, F.; Rueda-Hernández, R. & Dáttilo, W. (2022). Shopping for Ecological Indices? On the Use of Incidence-Based Species Compositional Similarity Measures. Diversity, 14(5), 384.es_MX
dc.identifier.issn1424-2818
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11117/10810
dc.language.isoenges_MX
dc.publisherMDPIes_MX
dc.rights.urihttp://quijote.biblio.iteso.mx/licencias/CC-BY-NC-2.5-MX.pdfes_MX
dc.subjectbeta diversity; nestedness; replacement; richness difference; species turnoveres_MX
dc.subjectBeta Diversityes_MX
dc.subjectNestednesses_MX
dc.subjectReplacementes_MX
dc.subjectRichness Differencees_MX
dc.subjectSpecies Turnoveres_MX
dc.titleShopping for Ecological Indices? On the Use of Incidence-Based Species Compositional Similarity Measureses_MX
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_MX
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_MX

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
5_ArtCientifico_NMS.pdf
Tamaño:
1.39 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Main article
Descargar

Colecciones

CIFOVIS - Artículos y ponencias con arbitraje